Modern efficient vehicles are posted with miles per gallon ratings that do not include the amount of

Last 5 stories in Opinion Never Forgotten - September 10, 2012 Letter from AVTT - July 17, 2012 Quick Tips on How to Go Green for Earth Day - April 23, 2012 Gas prices: have we reached the tipping w chicago hotel point? - April 18, 2012 The Truth About St. Patrick's Day - March 8, 2012 Other stories that might interest you...
For the past decade, people have been complaining about their cars and what terrible fuel mileage they are getting. The government has stepped in and passed laws that required vehicles to be more fuel efficient and not be as harmful to the environment. Automakers have been scrambling to come out with a vehicle w chicago hotel that is sellable and meets the government s criteria. Meanwhile, w chicago hotel automakers are being wasteful in creating and manufacturing their new efficient vehicles and in the end, harming the environment even further. On the other hand, some people like to believe that this is the first time that cars have reached over 40 MPG, and believe that automakers have made breakthrough w chicago hotel developments in car efficiency. While many auto makers have achieved this goal, it isn t the first time the auto industry has seen such efficient vehicles. These cars have been around for over three decades as they just get thrown away from society whenever they are actually the answer. Since just about everybody in the United State drives a vehicle, they think that they are automatic experts on this topic. This leads them into thinking that they latest fuel efficient vehicle is the highest this industry has ever seen. Everyday people go out and buy new cars because they think that they are saving money as well as environment while the outcomes barely alter their pocketbooks and the environment.
When purchasing a new car, the feeling of the initial gain is gratuitous, but the reality is that people are now spending even more money than they would with their new car payment if they hadn t bought a new car at all. When comparing an almost 20-year-old Pontiac Firebird with a brand new 2012 Toyota Prius C, benefits to the consumer s bank accounts will not be seen for years, unlike what they had anticipated from advertisements. If someone were to trade a 1992 Pontiac Firebird for a 2012 Toyota Prius C, it would take that person 188 months or 15 years and 8 months in order to only break even before he or she could start saving money. This statistic has been generated on the average mileage traveled in U.S. by a commuter of 29 miles a day. Thy buyer would be saving money by not having to pay for gas as frequently. w chicago hotel This is where the sense of gratification comes in and makes the person feel like they have won. The reality is that the person now has a monthly car payment which offsets and overcomes the gain in cash savings at the pump. After 15 to 16 years this brand new Prius C will be outdated and not be able to perform to the new government standards that will be set before the owner can actually start to see some gain out of what they have.
In 1990, the average U.S. fleet fuel economy was 22 miles per gallon. In 2005, this number dropped to a floor crawling 19.9 miles per gallon as an average rating for all vehicles manufactured. Vehicles of the 1970 s on through the 1990 s were achieving better fuel mileage than those of the 2000 s. The Honda Corporation came out with the Honda Civic in 1973, which was capable of achieving the modern-like 40 miles per gallon. A 2012 Honda Civic Hybrid is only capable of achieving 44 miles per gallon. Over the years the older vehicles have been overlooked by the newer vehicles even though they are relatively the exact same in fuel mileage.
w chicago hotel One of the biggest reasons why such great fuel efficient vehicles have been overlooked so much is because the newer vehicles are equipped with more electronic features. Just about every car on the market today comes equipped with a built-in GPS that makes the car very versatile while travelling in uncharted territory. Newer vehicles w chicago hotel are equipped with safety features that have put the older cars in the past with special crumple points and advanced motion detecting devices. Some cars are equipped with back up cameras w chicago hotel and auto-parallel parking assistance where the driver doesn t have to steer the car at all while the car parks itself. Today, when a person goes to roll down their window, they just simply hit a button. Simple enough right? w chicago hotel But what really occurs, is that that button gives a signal to a computer and that computer gives a signal to a series of security devices, then back to the computer, w chicago hotel then to the window motor. What happens is, these computers can often go bad and end up costing hundreds of dollars to replace. The simple fact is, all we really need is just a crank and be done with it.
History is only repeating itself by creating w chicago hotel the vehicles with nearly identical fuel mileage. Throughout the 1970 s and on into the 1980 s, auto manufacturers were creating experimental engines that would run on leaner air fuel mixtures. Since 1992, a device known as a catalytic converter has been mandatory w chicago hotel on all vehicles. Catalytic converters are useful in ways of health to the mentality of human beings as they have prevented thousands of deaths due to carbon-monoxide-related suicide. The catalytic converters can only handle air to fuel mixtures of 12:1; any leaner and the catalysts would melt and the product would not operate properly. Without a catalytic converter, engines would be able to run on 20:1 air to fuel mixtures and the vehicles that they are in would be able to create ratings w chicago hotel of around 100 miles per gallon.
Modern efficient vehicles are posted with miles per gallon ratings that do not include the amount of fuel used to create the assistant electricity, which sculpts the illusory concept of the vehicle being better for the environment. Truly modern efficient vehicles consist of electric assistance or they are either completely electric dependent vehicle. These vehicles are posted with miles per gallon rating in order for the consumer to compare these vehicles with those that rely independently on fuel. The problem is that the manufacturer doesn t include the amount of fuel used to create this electricity. Granted that there are ways to create electricity without burning fuels, whenever the majority of the people who plug their car in to charge, they are using electricity from a coal-burning power plant. When comparing a compact 2006 Toyota Corolla "the family car" that averages 31 miles to the gallon with a new, all-electric 2012 Tesla Roadster "sports car" which promises 245 miles of travel per charge, the pounds of carbon dioxide produced are not substantial enough to save the environment. Over 100 miles, the Corolla will consume 3.23 gallons of fuel, which in return produces 63.11 pounds of carbon dioxide. The Tesla Roadster, in the same distance, had consumed 31 kilowatt hours of electricity. In order to generate a kilowatt hour of electricity, the process produces an average of 1.55 pounds of carbon dioxide, which means that the Tesla Roadster emits 48.05 pounds of carbon dioxide per 100 miles. The difference made is only about the saving of not burning one gallon of fuel to the environment over 100 miles.
There are several things consumers can do to their existing vehicle in order to save money without having to buy a new fuel efficient vehicle. The first step is to take care of the vehicle that they already own and to keep it in its best condition every time they hit the road. One of the most serious and most common maintenance problems is a faulty oxygen sensor or known as an O2 sensor. If the problem is an oxygen sensor, this could be loosing fuel mileage as much as 40 percent. Always make sure your tires are not over or under inflated. Proper air pressure cuts down on fuel usage while driving by more than 3 percent compared to incorrect tire inflation. Driving techniques are also very important w chicago hotel and one of the easiest ways to save on fuel that don t have any extra expenses. Driving the proper speed limit is one of the best ways to save on fuel. The faster you go, the faster the wind pushes your car backwards. This results in the engine having to work harder to overcome the opposite forces being pushed on it. Driving smoothly by avoiding strong acceleration and fast, sudden stops can lower your gasoline mileage by 5 percent at lower speeds around town and by 33 percent at highway speeds. If the driver sees that they are approaching a stop sign or see the traffic w chicago hotel light turning yellow, they should let off of the gas far before a stop in order to coast down to a slow and steady w chicago hotel stop. This adds a few extra miles that the engine doesn t have to be under a load during a trip. If the driver knows that they have to go out for something, they should try to combine their errands instead of making multiple trips to the grocery store a week.
If people want to save money, it would not be a smart decision to go out and spend thousands of dollars. All they need to do is stay clear from the dealerships and spend more time with their existing vehicle while keeping their driving skills up to par. Sure, the older car might not have all of the bells and whistles that a new car has, but those only cause more distractions while driving.
w chicago hotel I put this story to the test and set out for the open road in my 1992 Firebird. The car is stock other than some low profile tires, which theoretically should make the gas mileage decrease. During this test I tried out several different driving styles and road types which involved a variance in speed, stoplights, and turns. At 52 miles per hour average over a course of 37 miles, I obtained 21.4 MPG. At 57.7 miles per hour average over a course of 102 miles, I had obtained 54.4 MPG. And finally, at 32.6 miles per hour average over a course w chicago hotel of 73 miles, I had obtained 30.7 MPG. My total mileage was 212 miles within 4 hours and 43 minutes. My average speed for the trip was 45 miles per hour since the trip included stop lights and some small town Ind